Peer Review and Process

JFK : Jurnal Fenomena Kesehatan Peer Review Process

Articles accepted by the editorial board for evaluation are subject to blind peer review. In case of dissidence between two referees when evaluating an article, that article is sent to a third referee. If an article is sent to more than two referees, the majority opinion is taken as a base. Referees are selected from among the scientific board or academicians from universities. For an article to be published in the journal, it is necessary that referees should state positive opinions.

In articles to be submitted to the journal, the following points are required to be considered:

1. Submitted articles should not have been published elsewhere before and should not be sent to more than one journal at the same time.

2. In studies presented verbally or on a poster in any congress, symposium, or scientific milieu, the name, place, and date of the activity should be specified.

3. In studies sponsored by an institution or a fund, the name of the sponsor institution and project tag should be given.

4. Information should be given about articles produced from these. Authors are responsible for misrepresentations.

5. For an article to be taken into examination, it should be prepared in accordance with the author guidelines of the Journal of Teacher Education and Educators.

7. For the size of figures, graphs, or the like drawings to be included in an article, you can benefit from the archive of the Journal of Teacher Education and Educators.

8. Authors are responsible for the contents of publications, defended opinions, the correctness of resources, citations, and copyrighted figures and visuals.